This is the fifth听blog in our series that examines how social determinants influence gender biases in public health research, menstrual hygiene product development, and women鈥檚 health outcomes.听
A recent highlighting potentially toxic levels of metals in a sample of store-bought tampons has raised concerns among some members of the public and garnered attention in the . While this study only showed the potential for toxicity鈥攏ot an increased level of toxins in individuals who use the selected brands of tampons鈥攊t does highlight the importance of individual choice in access to period products. While some people may find that tampons are the most comfortable and convenient option, others might feel more comfortable using reusable or organic products. Those in the U.S. who can afford to buy the period products they need at their convenience have a plethora of choices available to them鈥pads or tampons, with an applicator or none, organic or not, disposable products or reusable ones.听听
However, a shockingly of those who menstruate in the U.S. cannot afford the period products they need, when they need them. These individuals often have no choice. They rely on homemade, makeshift products like toilet paper, paper towels, rags, or cut up . Alternatively, they may rely on donated products from schools, food pantries, churches, or other community organizations. In these cases, their choices are often restricted to whatever items have been donated, which may not always align with their specific needs.
Not just an issue 鈥榚lsewhere鈥櫶
and have been on the international development agenda for over a decade. Period poverty refers to an 鈥 to menstrual products, education, and sanitation facilities.鈥 and coverage from various low- and middle-income countries have highlighted the challenges women and girls face in accessing essential resources鈥攍ike clean, absorbent supplies, water, sanitation, knowledge, and social support鈥攆or hygienic menstrual management. The lack of these resources has been linked to negative impacts on education and psychosocial outcomes. Only recently has attention turned to 鈥減eriod poverty鈥 in the U.S.听
A groundbreaking 2019 conducted among low-income adult women in St. Louis found that 64% were unable to afford period products at least once in the previous 12 months. Furthermore, 21% of those experiencing this issue faced it every month鈥攃oinciding with each menstrual cycle. Ongoing research continues to shed light on the extent and magnitude of 鈥減eriod poverty鈥 throughout the U.S.听
In 2019, an online revealed that around 20% of U.S. teens ages 13 to 19 reported trouble accessing or affording period products when needed. That percentage increased to 23% by as the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic hit the most economically vulnerable households the hardest. A follow-up showed that trends stabilized in 2023 but remained higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, a recent among a representative sample of adults who menstruate showed that period poverty in the U.S. increased from 2018 to 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Over half of the respondents in 2021 (59%) reported that they had experienced an episode of period product insecurity at some point in their lives. In 2021, about 38% reported that they were currently struggling to afford period products, up from around 30% in 2018. Clearly, access to and affordability of period products is a concern for both teens and adults in the U.S., not just elsewhere.听
Choice in products is a matter of dignity听
of the general population in the U.S. indicate that similar percentages of those who menstruate use disposable tampons and pads鈥47% and 46% respectively鈥攚ith smaller percentages using reusable products such as menstrual cups (19%) and period underwear (19%). shows, however, that product preferences can differ substantially by subgroup. Among low-income adult women surveyed, 56% expressed a preference for disposable pads, with only a small number having ever tried reusable menstrual products. Many strongly preferred overnight pads with wings which are heavily absorbent, so they could stretch their use longer and reduce the risk of staining their (often only) underwear. , where nearly all students are eligible for free鈥or reduced鈥lunch, the vast majority use disposable pads or liners. A few had tried tampons, while even fewer had used reusable products. For both adults and students, the key factor was having personal reasons for their preferences, shaped by their experiences and beliefs. Unfortunately, the period products they preferred for their unique needs were often unavailable through the resources they depended on.听
Period poverty knows no geographic bounds听
While much of the research around period poverty in the U.S. has focused on major metropolitan areas such as , , and recent studies emphasize that period poverty knows no boundaries. Research among adolescent girls in the and shows that students in these locations experience challenges accessing period products and trying to manage menstruation, especially at school鈥攕imilar to teens in larger metropolitan areas. A of school nurses across Missouri revealed that nurses in urban and rural areas of the state were equally likely to say they know students in their schools who are missing school due to their periods. As the percentage of students eligible for free鈥or reduced鈥lunch in a school increased, school nurses in both urban and rural areas were more likely to report that their students struggled to afford the period products they need and that their students were using homemade products to get by. from a representative sample of food pantry clients across Kansas, Missouri, and southwestern Illinois indicated that clients desire period products as a service at food pantries, regardless of state or rural/urban designation.听听听
Black and brown households are often the most vulnerable to period poverty听
Period poverty and menstrual hygiene challenges affect communities across the U.S., but regardless of location. In 2021, 23% of Black respondents and 24% of Latino respondents, compared to just 8% of white respondents. And nearly half of Black and Latino students also reported difficulty focusing on school due to a lack of access to period products, compared to 28% of white students. Furthermore, Latinos were more likely to report that the COVID-19 pandemic and consistently in both 2018 and 2021. Moreover, Black food pantry clients were more likely than their white counterparts to express a need for period products to be .
Addressing menstrual hygiene needs and period poverty in the U.S.听
Lack of menstrual hygiene and period poverty are multifaceted challenges, so we need a comprehensive approach to address them. First, we need to ensure that period products are freely available in places where those who need them most can access them, like schools, prisons, pantries, and shelters. Some municipalities, such as , are now requiring period products to be freely available in all public restrooms, similar to toilet paper and soap. The COVID-19 pandemic taught us that we need to consider period products as an essential basic need during emergency situations and humanitarian crises, meaning we need to consider ongoing access to period products when planning and preparing for such emergencies. Finally, it’s essential to recognize that menstrual hygiene needs extend beyond access to and affordability of period products. They must encompass education on menstrual hygiene practices, such as managing odor and cramps, understanding the variety of period products available, and learning how to access and use them. Additionally, addressing menstrual hygiene requires infrastructure, including safe public restrooms, particularly for individuals experiencing unstable housing.
Period poverty is a real concern in the U.S. It does not discriminate by geography, but it does reflect broader patterns of socioeconomic disparities in our society, especially among Black and brown people who menstruate. Therefore, our comprehensive approach to addressing period poverty must focus on access and affordability with special attention to the most vulnerable, regardless of geography. It is our responsibility to ensure that all who menstruate have the means to manage their menstruation hygienically and with minimal impact on their daily lives. It is our responsibility to ensure the basic dignity of all in our society鈥regardless of location, racial or ethnic identity, or socioeconomic status.听 听
-
Acknowledgements and disclosures
麻豆视传媒免费观看 recognizes individual diverse gender identities and is committed to upholding our values of diversity, equity, and inclusion while striving to use gender-inclusive language in our publications. Based upon the literature we have examined, this series uses definitions to highlight the gender spectrum, and the preferred language will be to use 鈥渨omen鈥 and 鈥渕en鈥 referencing those who self-identify as these genders. Brookings acknowledges that non-binary and gender non-conforming individuals may face similar and different barriers and challenges to those who self-identify as women and men. The term is intended to include those who are discriminated against based on their gender identities and biological sex.听
Commentary
Period poverty and its reach across the US
November 27, 2024